托福写作真题高分范本【通用文档】

对于备考托福的考生来说，托福写作是不能忽略的一部分，考生要注意平时多加练习。下面是小编为大家整理的两篇2017托福写作真题高分范文，欢迎大家参考。2017托福写作真题高分范文一T下面是小编为大家整理的托福写作真题高分范本【通用文档】,供大家参考。

　　对于备考托福的考生来说，托福写作是不能忽略的一部分，考生要注意平时多加练习。下面是小编为大家整理的两篇2017托福写作真题高分范文，欢迎大家参考。

　　2017托福写作真题高分范文一

　　The listening refutes the three functions raised in the reading to explain the existence of the eye in microbes.

　　First, the reading holds that the eye is used for following preys. Since the microbes’ preys are usually transparent, which means their movement will cause the oscillation of light, the eye can enable the microbes to detect those and follow the prey.. However, the listening points out that there are researches proving that other closely related microbes, which have no eyes, can also follow their prey successfully. Therefore, their eyes must be for other purposes.

　　Second, the reading believes that the eye is used to sense the sunlight. One part of the energy source of microbes is the sun, so with the eye sensing the intensity of sunlight they can find a better place to absorb the solar energy. On the contrary, in the listening, the eye can not sense sunlight, otherwise, it will not confirm with the law of evolution. Scientists find that they are becoming less and less dependent on sunlight for energy. Compared with their ancestors, the sea-dwelling microorganism is with a much more complex eye.

　　Third, the reading suggests that the eye has aiming function which help microbes target the prey more accurately when they send forth something like spear to stab. However, the listening refutes that researchers find that the eye couldn’t focus quite well and can not form clear image, which means they are not able to have better accuracy at their preys when stabbing them.

　　2017托福写作真题高分范文二

　　The reading and listening discuss about mysterious prints reported in an English newspaper. The reading points out three hypotheses to explain the mysterious prints. Whereas, the professor totally refutes the three points presented in the passage.

　　Firstly, the professor rebuts the reading’s idea that this was kangaroo footprint. The professor claims that Kangaroo’s sharp and powerful claws would make deep marks during long trails. And if the footprints were left by the fleeing kangaroo, there must have been reports about this incident, but there wasn’t.

　　Secondly, the professor contradicts reading’s second hypothesis that it was made by hot air balloon, which can be demonstrated by the broken rope and blots. The professor mentions that there was a forest area in the way, and the hot air balloon would be entangled by tree branches and could not travel that long distance.

　　At last, the passage states that the whole story was invented although reported trustworthy. However, the professor explains that the report was based on reliable materials. For one thing, there’s letter from Devin who found the footprints; for another thing, newspaper office collected a lot of details about the print. Thus the report wouldn’t be invented.

推荐访问:托福 高分 范本 托福写作真题高分范本 2023托福写作真题高分范文 2023托福写作真题高分范文及答案 2023托福写作真题高分范文答案 2023托福写作真题高分范文下载