当前位置: 简表范文网 > 专题范文 > 调查报告 >

2020年4月全球金融稳定报告(全文)

| 来源:网友投稿

下面是小编为大家整理的2020年4月全球金融稳定报告(全文),供大家参考。

2020年4月全球金融稳定报告(全文)

 

 The COVID-19 Crisis

  The COVID-19 pandemic poses unprecedented health, economic, and financial stability challenges. The first priority is, of course, to save lives. But the necessary containment measures to limit the spread of the virus are causing a dramatic decline in economic activity. As a result, in only three months, the 2020 outlook has shifted from expected growth of more than 3 percent globally to a sharp contraction of negative 3 percent—much worse than the output loss seen during the 2008–09 global financial crisis. The ultimate impact of the crisis on the global economy, as well as the timing of a recovery, is highly uncertain. This crisis presents a very serious threat to the stability of the global financial system. Following the COVID-19 outbreak, financial conditions tightened at unprecedented speed, exposing some ―cracks‖ in global financial markets. Market volatility spiked and borrowing costs surged on expectations of widespread defaults. Signs of strain emerged in major funding markets, including the global US dollar funding market. Historically large capital outflows exacerbated domestic shocks in emerging market economies. These developments have raised the risk that the inability of borrowers to service their debts would put pressure on banks and cause credit markets to freeze up. A prolonged period of dislocation in financial markets could trigger distress among financial institutions, which, in turn, could lead to a credit crunch for nonfinancial borrowers, further exacerbating the economic downturn. To safeguard economic and financial stability and to prevent the emergence of adverse macro- financial feedback loops, countries are taking decisive actions. Central banks have eased monetary policy and are providing liquidity to the financial system, including through foreign-currency swap lines, to maintain the flow of credit to the economy. Thanks to these efforts, funding markets have remained functional and investor sentiment has shown signs of improvement. Supervisors are encouraging banks to prudently renegotiate loan terms for those struggling to service their debts in order to help bridge the period of economic inactivity, and to use existing capital and liquidity buffers, as well as other flexibility in their regulatory and accounting frameworks, to absorb losses. Country authorities are supporting people and companies through sizable, timely, temporary, and targeted fiscal measures to put a limit on defaults of

 firms and households via payment moratoriums and guaranteed credit. Multilateral cooperation has increased the resources available to support the most vulnerable countries and communities. The IMF, with $1 trillion in available resources, is actively supporting its member countries. These policies are essential to ensure that a temporary shutdown of production does not lead to more permanent damage to the productive capacity of the economy, to the financial system, and to the fabric of society. Once the virus outbreak is under control, policies should be aimed at fostering the recovery, as well as assessing and healing the damage inflicted by the pandemic on the balance sheets of non-financial firms, financial institutions, and governments. Tobias Adrian Financial Counsellor

  International Monetary Fund | April 2020

 i FOREWORD

  The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic presents a historic challenge. In mid-February, when market participants started to fear that the outbreak would become a global pandemic, the prices of equities fell sharply, from previously overstretched levels. In credit markets, spreads skyrocketed, especially in risky segments such as high-yield bonds, leveraged loans, and private debt, where issuance essentially came to a halt. Oil prices plummeted in the face of weakening global demand and the failure of the OPEC+ countries to reach an agreement on output cuts, adding a further leg to the deterioration in risk appetite. These volatile market conditions led to a flight to quality, with yields on safe-haven bonds declining abruptly. A number of factors amplified asset price moves, contributing to a sharp tightening of financial conditions at unprecedented speed. Signs of strain emerged in major short-term funding markets, including the global market for US dollars—a development reminiscent of dynamics last seen during the financial crisis a decade ago. Market liquidity deteriorated considerably, including in markets traditionally seen as very deep. Leveraged investors came under pressure, with some reportedly forced to close out some of their positions in order to meet margin calls and rebalance their portfolios. However, markets have pared back some of the losses. Decisive monetary and fiscal policy actions, aimed at containing the fallout from the pandemic, have stabilized investor sentiment. Nevertheless, there is still a risk of a further tightening in financial conditions that could expose financial vulnerabilities, which have been highlighted repeatedly in previous Global Financial Stability Reports. Emerging and frontier market economies are facing the perfect storm. They have experienced the sharpest reversal in portfolio flows on record, both in dollar terms and as a share of emerging and frontier market GDP. This loss of external debt financing is likely to put pressure on more leveraged and less creditworthy borrowers. This may lead to a rise in debt restructurings, which could test existing debt resolution frameworks.

 ii International Monetary Fund | April 2020 The April 2020 G lo b a l

 F i n a n c i a l

 St a b i li t y

 Re p o r t

 at a Glance

 The outbreak of COVID-19 has dealt an unprecedented blow to global financial markets. Risk asset prices have plummeted and borrowing costs have soared, especially in risky credit markets. Emerging and frontier markets have experienced the sharpest portfolio flow reversal on record. The priority is to save lives and to support the people and companies most affected by COVID-19. Fiscal, monetary, and financial policies should be used to support economies stricken by the pandemic. International cooperation is essential to tackle this extraordinary global crisis. 

 EXECUTIVE

 SUMMARY

 Asset managers may face further outflows from their funds and may be forced to sell assets into falling markets, potentially exacerbating price moves. High levels of borrowing by companies and households may lead to debt distress as the economy comes to a sudden stop. Banks have more capital and liquidity than in the past, they have been subject to stress tests, and central bank liquidity support has helped mitigate funding risks, putting them in a better position than at the onset of the global financial crisis. The resilience of banks, however, may be tested in some countries in the face of large market and credit losses, and this may cause them to cut back their lending to the economy, amplifying the slowdown in activity. This historic challenge necessitates a forceful policy response. The priority is to save lives and to implement appropriate containment measures to avoid overwhelming health systems. Country authorities need to support people and companies that have been most affected by the virus outbreak, as discussed in the April 2020 World Economic Outlook. To that end, authorities across the globe have already implemented wide-ranging policies. The April 2020 Fiscal Monitor describes the fiscal support packages that have been announced by governments across the globe. Large, timely, temporary, and targeted fiscal measures are necessary to ensure that a temporary shutdown of activity does not lead to more permanent damage to the productive capacity of the economy and to society as a whole. Central banks globally have taken bold and decisive actions by easing monetary policy, purchasing a range of assets, and providing liquidity to the financial system in an effort to lean against the tightening in financial conditions and maintain the flow of credit to the economy. As policy rates are now near or below zero in many major advanced economies, unconventional measures and forward guidance about the expected policy path are becoming the main tools for these central banks going forward. Central banks may also consider further measures to support the economy during these challenging times. Policymakers need to maintain a balance between safeguarding financial stability and supporting economic activity.  Banks. In the first instance, banks’ existing capital and liquidity buffers should be used to absorb losses and funding pressures. In cases where the impact is sizable or longer lasting and bank capital adequacy is affected, supervisors should take targeted actions, including asking banks to submit credible capital restoration plans. Authorities may also need to step in with fiscal support—either direct subsidies or tax relief—to help borrowers to repay their loans and finance their operations, or provide credit guarantees to banks. Supervisors should also encourage banks to negotiate, in a prudent manner, temporary adjustments to loan terms for companies and households struggling to service their debts.  Asset managers. To prudently manage liquidity risks associated with large outflows, regulators should encourage fund managers to make full use of the available liquidity tools where it would be in the interests of unit holders to do so.  Financial markets. Market resilience should be promoted through well-calibrated, clearly defined, and appropriately communicated measures, such as circuit breakers.

 International Monetary Fund | April 2020

 iii

 Many emerging market economies are already facing volatile market conditions and should manage these pressures through exchange rate flexibility, where feasible. For countries with adequate reserves, exchange rate intervention can lean against market illiquidity and thus play a role in muting excessive volatility. However, interventions should not prevent necessary adjustments in the exchange rate. In the face of an imminent crisis, capital flow management measures could be part of a broad policy package, but they cannot substitute for warranted macroeconomic adjustment...

相关推荐

热门文章

公司党委关于巡察整改进展情况的报告

x公司党委关于巡察整改进展情况的报告xx省公司党委:根据xx省公司统一部署,20xx年x月15日至x

初级中学五项管理工作整改报告

巩义市第一初级中学于2021年8月开始招生,是一所36班规模的寄宿制初级中学,学校确立“一教育”为学

两会报告读后感9篇

两会报告读后感9篇两会报告读后感篇1全国“两会”的召开,是对经济社会各项事业发展的总结,更是未来

2022年个人自查报告,个人自查报告(共10篇)范本(全文完整)

最近发表了一篇名为《个人自查报告个人自查报告(共10篇)范本》的范文,好的范文应该跟大家分享,重新整理了一下发到这里。下面是小编为大家整理的个人自查报告个人自查报告(共10篇)范本,供大家参考。个人自查报告由的会员“浪漫雨荷”投稿精心推荐,小编希

建筑业管理所行政处罚工作自查报告

为深入推进法治政府建设,全面落实行政执法“三项制度”,进一步提升本区行政执法水平,根据市法治政府建设

2022年科级干部述职述廉报告3篇

2022年科级干部述职述廉报告3篇2022年科级干部述职述廉报告篇1勤善是立身之本,勤勉是立业之

2024年个人述责述廉报告,(2)【优秀范文】

过去的一年,在*教科文的的岗位上,我始终秉承着“在岗一分钟,尽职六十秒”的态度努力做好教科文的岗位本职工作,并时刻严格要求自己,摆正自己的工作位置和态度。在*领导、部门领导和同事们的支持和帮助下,我在

2022年优秀交通事故调查报告10篇【精选推荐】

《优秀交通事故调查报告10篇》是一篇好的范文,好的范文应该跟大家分享,希望大家能有所收获。调查报告是反映对某个问题、某个事件或某方面情况调查研究所获得的成果的文章。而交通是我们都要注意的问题,那交通调查报告有哪些呢?以下是小编为大家收集整理的交通事故调查报告的全部内容了,仅供参考。优秀交通事故调查报

关于校园安全隐患报告

《关于校园安全隐患报告多篇》是一篇好的范文,感觉很有用处,看完如果觉得有帮助请记得(CTRL+D)收藏本页。要立即开展大排查大整治,配合当地****和有关部门深入开展学校及周边房屋安全大排查,加强校园及周边老旧危房和校园周边出租屋重点整治,建立风险清单,切实消除安全隐患;下面是小编给大家整理的关于校

关于公车使用管理自查情况的报告

x办公室:根据贵室《关于组织开展全x公车使用管理情况自查清理工作的通知》要求,xx中心对公车使用管理

2022四世同堂读书报告7篇

本页是最新发布的《四世同堂读书报告7篇》的详细范文参考文章,觉得有用就收藏了,为了方便大家的阅读。读书报告7篇四世同堂读书报告篇1语言大师老舍先生的《四世同堂》共分为三部——惶惑、偷生、饥荒。故事发生在七七事变到抗战胜利这八年之间,讲述了一**三七年“七·七事变”侵华日军的铁蹄践踏着古老的

优秀个人工作总结报告(精选文档)

《2022年优秀个人工作总结报告》是一篇好的范文,感觉很有用处,重新整理了一下发到这里。写总结是为了总结经验和教训。经过实践的积累,相信自我在工作的各方面都有了明显的提高,但也要不断的改善自我的方式方法,给写一份总结。下面是小编收集整理的2022年优秀个人